It's billed as the solution to legal procurement woes, but it's really just part of the problem — and making it worse.
View in browser
Kill Bill – Newsletter

Hi there,

 

“Why is e-billing even a ‘thing?’” 

 

It’s a good question — at least I think it is. 

 

Let me first start by saying that e-billing (like a lot of problematic things in legal) is largely a symptom of a broken system that we’re all trapped in, but not necessarily responsible for. 

 

But to my point about “why e-billing?” 

 

E-billing is one of the few payment ecosystems that sits outside of the traditional enterprise purchasing model. 

 

And it makes no sense. 🤔

 

For example, here’s how traditional enterprise billing systems work: 

  1. Both parties agree on a price for services.
  2. Vendor submits and client approves the purchase order.
  3. Work gets done.
  4. Invoice gets sent. 
  5. Invoice gets paid.

Contrast this with e-billing in legal:  

  1. Firms and lawyers agree on an hourly price.
  2. Then you have to make sure you have outside counsel guidelines in place.
  3. Lawyers get to work — and have to document everything they do in painful 6-minute increments. 
  4. Firms submit incredibly lengthy invoices each month documenting each tiny sliver of time spent. 
  5. Clients spend hours cross-checking these against outside counsel guidelines — it adds up fast. (Some e-billing solutions endeavour to automate this process.)
  6. Clients reject erroneous charges. 
  7. Firm appeals these rejections.
  8. This goes on for a bit.
  9. Firm and client finally agree.
  10. Client pays firm.
  11. Firm finally receives payment — but not after a significant delay and plenty of write-offs. 

None of this even takes into consideration the hundreds of hours that in-house teams spend on due diligence of e-billing vendors, piloting potential solutions, and implementing the one they choose.

 

Nor does it include the recurring cost of e-billing platforms or the internal human capital required to run them.

 

For firms managing multiple versions of e-billing systems which vary by client, they’re essentially being levied a silent tax in running each of these systems — just to get invoices paid.  

 

Like I said before. E-billing makes no sense.

 

Yet it continues to get tremendous air time in legal — despite other technology solutions (like PERSUIT) that are:

 

➡️ Vastly easier to implement ✅ 

➡️ Have a much higher ROI 💵 

➡️ Have a rapid time-to-value (We’ve seen 5X-30X ROI and sometimes in a matter of weeks!) ⏳

 

When compared to other legal technology being implemented by corporate legal departments that are more resource-heavy, lower-ROI, and hard-to-value technology solutions, our platform should be an easy choice. 🥇 

 

(If you didn’t already know, PERSUIT is a legal tech platform that fundamentally changes how in-house legal teams engage outside counsel.)

 

But it often isn’t. 

 

(Of course when our clients finally come to “see the light,” they often wonder why they didn’t use us sooner 😇 .)

 

It just goes to show that the ecosystem that dictates how in-house counsel and firms engage is complex — with many players doing their best to navigate a system that they didn’t (and likely wouldn’t) choose.   

 

Like e-billing. 

 

It’s billed as a solution — but is arguably part of the problem by continuing to prop up what (in my view) is an unsustainable system for clients to engage their outside counsel. 

 

Fixing the inefficiencies in that system isn’t going to be easy. 

 

But we’re going to keep trying until we get there 🌈.

 

 

 

Cheers,

Jim Delkousis

-Jim Delkousis

Founder and CEO

PERSUIT | persuit.com

 

Learn More About PERSUIT

PERSUIT RANKINGS

Top Firms in Finance and Insurance on PERSUIT 

Law firms that have been awarded the most work by clients in the finance and insurance services industry by dollar amount on PERSUIT over the past 12 months (Minimum 3 RFPs, 3 awards). 

  1. Morgan Lewis & Bockius
  2. Mayer Brown
  3. Allen & Overy
  4. Sidley Austin
  5. Clifford Chance

For more firm rankings, download The PERSUIT 50, our report of the most trusted firms on the PERSUIT platform.

PODCAST: INNOVATIVE LEGAL LEADERSHIP

Recent Podcasts

  • Episode 1 Throwback: Why GCs are the New CEOs of Legal
    • Cam Findlay: Archer Daniels Midland
  • Episode 100! Keep Expanding Your Discomfort Zone
    • Michelle Landy: PERSUIT
  • Do Something You're Afraid of Every Day
    • Nicole Kelsey: Amyris
  • Legal Gambits With Imperfect Information
    • Alan Tse: Jones Lang Lasalle
  • Optimizing Legal Ops Without Compromising Quality
    • Mike Haven: Intel

You can find the podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or the podcast player of your choice.

WEBINARS

Recent Webinar Recordings

  • Can AFAs Be Used for Complex IP Litigation? 
  • 5 Myths (Debunked!) About Reverse Auctions in Legal
  • How to Make AFAs a Win-Win: Lessons From the Firm Side
  • Out of the AFA Wilderness: How to Confidently Navigate the M&A Scoping Process
  • AFAs Aren't "Alternative" Anymore

NEWSLETTER

Previous Editions of the Kill Bill(able Hours) Newsletter 

  • 7 ways lawyers are solving problems using PERSUIT
  • Killing the Billable + Legal Tech?
  • Is legal like a pyramid scheme? 
  • E-billing pitched as savings? It's a con
  • Let's end the controversy over reverse auctions in legal
Logo-Persuit
LinkedIn
Twitter

PERSUIT, 48 W 25th Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10010

Manage preferences